Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Sprint PCS Assets v. City of Morro Bay et al
as 2:2007cv07613
Plaintiff:
Sprint PCS Assets
Defendant:
City of Morro Bay, City Council of the City of Morro Bay, Janice Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Kinder v. Sprint PCS Assets LLC et al
as 3:2007cv02049
Plaintiff:
James M Kinder, -
Defendant:
Sprint PCS Assets LLC, Sprint PCS License LLC and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mathieu v. Calvary Portfolio Services, LLC et al
as 3:2007cv05479
Plaintiff:
Chocalee Mathieu and Chocalee Mathieu
Defendant:
Calvary Portfolio Services, LLC and Sprint PCS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007at00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00828
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sprint PCS Assets v. City of Palos Verdes, et al
as 05-56106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPRINT PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, wholly-owned by Sprint Telephony PCS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, a California municipality, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, its governing body, JOSEPH SHERWOOD, in his official capacity as Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Palos Verdes Estates and others
Amicus Curiae:
PCIA - THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION, AND THE DAS FORUM, THE CALIFORNIA WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, NEWPATH NETWORKS, LLC AND EXTENET SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA) LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
Caston v. Compaq Computer Corp, et al
as 2:2002cv00905
Defendant:
IBM, Intel, Compaq Computer Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
