Cases 11 - 20 of 3,273
Grantham et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Blaine Grantham, Margaret Grantham, Walter Grantham and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Stochevski v. Weingarten et al
as 4:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Walter Stochevski
Defendant:
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt, Charlene T. Begley and others
Cox #095548 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Charles L Ryan, Lori Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Walter McKenna v. Alexander Olave
as 8:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Walter McKenna
Defendant:
Alexander Olave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Andres-Zacarias, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1640
Petitioner:
GERARDO MIGUEL ANDRES-ZACARIAS and WALTER JOSE ANDRES-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr.
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Primrose
as 24-1462
Defendant:
WALTER GLENN PRIMROSE and Bobby Edward Fort
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cruz et al v. TriStruX LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Walter Cruz and Antonio Angelo Larranaga
Defendant:
TriStruX LLC, Leone Electric Co. LLC and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
