Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes, et al
as 22-55496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE SAWICKY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAO SYKES, Manuel Real Beneficiary, PERCY ANDERSON, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ and others
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes et al
as 2:2021cv09023
Plaintiff:
Christine Sawicky
Defendant:
Tao Sykes, Percy Anderson, Philip S. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Daniel Andrews v. City of Henderson, et al
as 20-17053
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. EBERT, K. LIPPISCH, K. LAPEER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DANIEL ANDREWS
Defendant / Appellant:
KARL LIPPISCH, PHILLIP WATFORD and CITY OF HENDERSON
Chad Larsen v. USCA9, et al
as 20-16664
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, BYBEE, TASHIMA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD ANDREW LARSEN
Fields #257135 v. Tuchi et al
as 2:2020cv01308
Plaintiff:
Handson Eugene Fields, Jr., Hanson Eugene Fields and Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
John J Tuchi, Jay S Bybee, A Wallace Tashima and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larsen v. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit et al
as 4:2020cv03420
Defendant:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Bybee, Watford and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Andrew Larsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kraft v. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06971
Defendant:
Kiry Gray, Mary E. Powell, Robert F. Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kraft v. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03036
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Oldcastle Precast, Inc., Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Joseph C. Faucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
