Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,073
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01858
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Boysen, et al. v. PeaceHealth, et al.
as 24-5204
Defendant: PEACEHEALTH, Gov. KATE BROWN, LIZ DUNNE and others
Plaintiff: SARAH GUIMONT, MICAELA WEST, DEBORAH SHANEYFELT and others
Doe LS 340, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
as 24-5063
Plaintiff: B. R., A. M., KATHERINE HYLIN and others
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01767
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
DiCostanzo v. County of Yellowstone et al
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Angelo Louis DiCostanzo
Defendant: Mike Linder, County of Yellowstone, Unknown Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv04731
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06579
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06580
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04718
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Murphy v. Wedan
as 24-4717
Defendant: RICHARD WILLIAM WEDAN
Plaintiff: JAMES M. MURPHY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?