Cases 21 - 30 of 18,270
Adams et al v. Lake Havasu, City of et al
as 3:2024cv08112
Plaintiff:
David Hezekiah Adams, Rebekah Adams and Noah Adams
Defendant:
Lake Havasu, City of, Chad T Graybeal, Unknown Graybeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-3599
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL RIVERA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rodgers v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Daniel Edward Rodgers
Respondent:
Warden Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kisliuk v. City of Fort Bragg et al
as 1:2024cv03440
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson Kisliuk
Defendant:
City of Fort Bragg, Mendocino County Sheriff's Office, Thomas O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Harper v. California State Prison Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv04885
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
California State Prison Lancaster, Leanna Lundy and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Daniel James Harper v. CSP Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv04993
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
CSP Lancaster, Correctional Officer M. McNeal, Correctional Officer M. Michael Lemone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
