Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 352
United States of America v. Lopez-Armenta
as 23-618
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: FERNANDO LOPEZ-ARMENTA
John McClintock, et al v. T. Cooper, et al
as 23-15513
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN SCOTT MCCLINTOCK
Defendant / Appellee: T. COOPER, Sgt., M. ARMENTA, Guard, WINKLER, Guard and others
Defendant: B. MCCLOUGHAN, JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, M. VOONG and others
(PC) Armenta v. St. Andre et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff: Richard Armenta
Defendant: R. St. Andre, Shalom Orenstein, Brian Kiebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva Armenta v. Garland
as 23-187
Petitioner: TADEO ENRIQUE SILVA ARMENTA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jessica Armenta v. Fave Me, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff: Jessica Armenta
Defendant: Fave Me, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(PC) Armenta v. Miranda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff: Richard Armenta
Defendant: Rafael Miranda, K. Reuter, B. Kiebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Armenta v. Garland
as 22-1928
Petitioner: DULCE MARIA LOPEZ-ARMENTA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Armenta #347230 v. Weigel
as 2:2022cv01616
Plaintiff: Joseph T Armenta
Defendant: N Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudy Franco v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 22-16315
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUDY ARMENTA FRANCO
Defendant / Appellee: ARIZONA, STATE OF, DAVID SHINN, Director, A.D.O.C. RR Director and GEO CORPORATION, referred to in caption of amended complaint as GEO Corp./ Secure Security - Private Facility at Kingman
Dennis Petillo v. Armenta
as 2:2022cv05471
Plaintiff: Dennis Petillo
Defendant: Armenta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?