Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Brockway v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv01371
Plaintiff:
William Robert Brockway
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Paul Penzone, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffmann v. Baca et al
as 3:2018cv00060
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Candice Brockway, Nurse Gaylene and others
Plaintiff:
Garret Hoffmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Candice Brockway and Ashley Randolph
Plaintiff:
Donald Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00159
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, C. Brockway, Karen Gedney and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rohn Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towles v. Baca et al
as 3:2016cv00731
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, C. Brockway and others
Plaintiff:
Dee V. Towles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morse v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00680
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Candace Brockway, Chief of Nursing Services and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Morse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevarez v. Baca et al
as 3:2016cv00676
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Candice Brockway and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Nevarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Brockway v. CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York
as 2:2016cv08244
Plaintiff:
Keith Brockway
Defendant:
CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York
Ridout v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00581
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Candi Brockway, Karen Gedney and others
Plaintiff:
John P. Ridout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Follett v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00429
Defendant:
"Sunshine", Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Sean David Follett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
