Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard
as 22-15073
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Respondent / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex Warden
Mikeal Stine v. Amanda Stangl, et al
as 22-15035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA STANGL, Unit Manager at USP - Tucson, CATRICIA HOWARD, named as C. Howard, Complex Warden at USP / Tucson, GARRETT MERRELL, Lieutenant - SIS at USP / Tucson and others
Mikeal Stine v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 22-15034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, named as Ms. C. Howard, Complex Warden at USP / Tucson Arizona, BASS, Unknown; named as Ms. Bass, Health Services Administrator at USP / Tucson Arizona, REY, Unknown; named as Mr. Rey, Complex Captain at USP / Tucson Arizona and others
Mikeal Stine v. Catricia Howard
as 22-15011
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, named as Warden C. Howard
Schexnayder et al v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ashdon Schexnayder and Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikael Stine v. Catricia Howard
as 21-17125
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIKAEL GLENN STINE
Respondent / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, named as Warden C. Howard
Hernandez v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00541
Petitioner:
Joaquin Mendez Hernandez
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fly et al v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00521
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, Bryson Levi Knobeloch, Toni Fly and others
Defendant:
Catricia Howard, M Diaz, M Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knobeloch v. Gerrettie et al
as 4:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Bryson L Knobeloch and Nevaeh Olivia Knobeloch
Defendant:
J Gerrettie, J Santacruz, E Fraijo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00513
Petitioner:
Jose Martinez
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
