Cases 21 - 30 of 4,507
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diaz v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Pricilla Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Group Fifty Eight LLC v. Mercedes Ramirez et al
as 2:2024cv02712
Plaintiff:
Group Fifty Eight LLC
Defendant:
Mercedes Ramirez, Steven Martinez, Marizza Garcia and others
Interested Party:
Juan Diaz
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Phillips v. Henderson et al
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
T. Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Bill Henderson, Holly Knief, Nancy Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera Orellana, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1747
Petitioner:
ANGEL MAURICIO RIVERA ORELLANA, HELEN YAMILETH CEBILLA DIAZ and MAURICIO ALEXANDER RIVERA CEBILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
