Cases 21 - 29 of 29
CLARK-GOMEZ et al
as 4:2009cv00378
Plaintiff:
CRUZ ALICIA CLARK-GOMEZ, GUADALUPE RAFAEL GARCIA-OSUNA, MARIA LORENIA CLARK-GOMEZ and others
Defendant:
United States Government, US Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lopez Rodriguez, et al v. SGLC Inc., et al
as 2:2008cv01971
Plaintiff:
Fray Marcelino Lopez Rodriguez, Fray Marcelino Lopez Rodriguez, Fray Marcelino Lopez Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
SGLC, INC., Salvador Gonzalez, Julian Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez Rodriguez, et al v. SGLC Inc., et al
as 2:2008at00974
Plaintiff:
Fray Marcelino Lopez Rodriguez, Fray Marcelino Lopez Rodriguez, Fray Marcelino Lopez Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
SGLC, INC., Cesar Hugo Ibarra Ceja, Abraham Jimenez Bueno and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzalez et al v. Sterling Builders, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00943
Plaintiff:
Adenamar Gonzalez, Adenamar Gonzalez, Giovanni Ballesteros-Moreno and others
Defendant:
Sterling Builders, Inc., MST Construction, Inc., Jade Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Juan Garcia v. D Adams
as 08-55519
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN ENRIQUE GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
D ADAMS, Warden
Enrique Garcia-Montano v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-71013
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE GARCIA-MONTANO
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Garcia-Pena, et al v. Holder
as 08-70165
Petitioner:
LUIS ENRIQUE GARCIA-PENA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Garcia v Adams
as 8:2007cv00483
Plaintiff:
Juan Enrique Garcia
Respondent:
D Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Subia
as 3:2007cv01107
Petitioner:
Enrique Garcia
Respondent:
Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
