Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Matthew Corzine v. Adam Laxalt, et al
as 17-16605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW CORZINE
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM PAUL LAXALT, JAMES WRIGHT, Director of NV Dept. of Public Safety, NATALIE WOOD, Chief of the Division of Parole and Probation and others
Corzine v. Laxalt et al
as 3:2017cv00052
Defendant:
Patrick J. Conmay, Adam Paul Laxalt, K. Lomprey and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Corzine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quintero v. Aranan et al
as 3:2016cv00673
Defendant:
Romeo Aranan, Isidro Baca, Connie Bisbee and others
Plaintiff:
John Quintero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Wright v. Sinclar et al
as 2:2016cv07230
Defendant:
Does, Deputy Sinclair and Deputy Terrazas
Plaintiff:
James Wright
James Wright v. Sinclar et al
as 5:2016cv02047
Defendant:
Does, Deputy Sinclair and Deputy Terrazas
Plaintiff:
James Wright
John et al v. Garcia et al
as 1:2016cv02368
Respondent:
Agustin Garcia, Sarah Brown Garcia, Nathan Brown, II and others
Petitioner:
Adrian John, Sr , Barbara Morinda , Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoover v. NV. Board of Parole Commissioners et al
as 3:2014cv00021
Respondent:
Danny Abrein, I. Baca, Dave Bochalo and others
Petitioner:
Keith Shanon Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2013cv00559
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Curtis Cole, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright, Jr. v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2012cv00286
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
James Wright, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon Wright v. J. Hamlet
as 11-17853
Petitioner - Appellant:
GORDON JAMES WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
J. HAMLET, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
