Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
John Yarcho v. City of Issaquah, et al
as 11-35386
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M YARCHO
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF ISSAQUAH, AVA FRISINGER, LEON KOSS and others
Nadine Hays v. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv03198
Defendant: Tonya Aikens, Officer Albaro, Dennis Barlow and others
Plaintiff: Nadine Hays
Bedke et al v. Salazar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00399
Plaintiff: Jared K. Bedke, Bruce Byron Bedke and Martha Jean Bedke
Defendant: Ken Salazar, US Department of Interior, US Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neighbour v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2008cv05440
Plaintiff: Dorinda Joy Neighbour
Defendant: State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services, Division of Family and Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Bafus, et al v. Aspen Realty, Inc., et al
as 08-35549
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT BAFUS, RENAE BAFUS, GENE DUDLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: ASPEN REALTY, INC., DBA Coldwell Banker Aspen Realty and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-50
Dave Merrithew, et al v. Park Pointe Realty, Inc., et al
as 08-35548
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVE MERRITHEW, EMILY MERRITHEW, MICHAEL B. HOWELL and others
Defendant - Appellee: PARK POINTE REALTY, INC., DBA John L. Scott Real Estate and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-50
Phillips
as 2:2007cv01274
Plaintiff: Lee Phillips and Dan Frazier
Defendant: Patricia Boomsma, Terence Hance, Terry Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier v. Boomsma et al
as 3:2007cv08040
Defendant: Patricia J Boomsma, Terence Hance, Terry Goddard and others
Plaintiff: Dan Frazier, Dan Frazier, Dan Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?