Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Joshua David Mellberg LLC, et al v. Jovan Will, et al
as 20-16216
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DAVID MELLBERG, an individual and JOSHUA DAVID MELLBERG LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, DBA JD Mellberg Financial
Counter Claimant:
IMPACT PARTNERSHIP LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
Defendant:
JOVAN WILL, an individual, CARLY URETZ, JOHN DOE LATHAM and others
Joshua David Mellberg LLC v. Zaal
as 4:2019cv00568
Respondent:
Andre Zaal
Petitioner:
Joshua David Mellberg LLC and Joshua David Mellberg LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as JD Mellberg Financial
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
In the Matter of Joshua David Mackenroth - SBN 166970
as 3:2019mc80262
Respondent:
Joshua David Mackenroth
Nicholas v. Snake River Correctional Facility
as 2:2018cv01278
Petitioner:
Joshua David Nicholas
Respondent:
Snake River Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joshua David Alfano v. M.E. Spearman
as 2:2017cv08430
Petitioner:
Joshua David Alfano
Respondent:
M. E. Spearman
Joshua David Mellberg LLC v. Szigeti
as 2:2017cv00835
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Mellberg LLC
Defendant:
Robert Szigeti
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
USA v. Joshua Fink
as 16-50412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSHUA DAVID FINK, AKA David Joshua Fink, AKA Wolverine
Joshua David Williams v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv02213
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Chula Vista Police Dept, National City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Williams
Williams v. Dumanis et al
as 3:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Williams
Defendant:
Bonnie Dumanis, San Diego District Attorney's Office, Jan Goldsmith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giddings v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2016cv00026
Petitioner:
Joshua David Giddings
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
