Cases 21 - 30 of 6,167
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
William Lewis Ross III v. Arrowhead Credit Union et al
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Ross, III
Defendant:
Arrowhead Credit Union and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Stephens v. Montejo, et al.
as 24-2291
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE EARL STEPHENS, also known as Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
E. MONTEJO, Doctor, J. G. STUMPF, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Unsworth v. Lewis & Clark College
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Lisa Unsworth
Defendant:
Lewis & Clark College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Simon v. Bountiful Company et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jason Lewis Simon
Defendant:
The Bountiful Company, Nordic Naturals, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Thompson, et al. v. Deschutes County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2113
Plaintiff:
RONALD THOMPSON and RACHEL A. THOMPSON
Defendant:
DESCHUTES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JONATHAN EBNER, in both his official and individual capacity, AARON ALEXANDER, in both his official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lewis v. Skagit County et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Robert H Lewis, III
Defendant:
Skagit County, Skagit Valley Hospital, Emergency Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
