Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Herrera v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2012cv01565
Plaintiff:
Roberto Herrera
Defendant:
Huu Nguyen, M. Espinoza, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Albert M Espinoza
as 2:2011cv03878
Defendant:
Albert M Espinoza
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Jeffrey Woodfork v. Aref Fakhoury, et al
as 11-55358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ANTHONY WOODFORK
Defendant - Appellee:
AREF FAKHOURY, Warden, K. BROWN, Correctional Sergeant, in his/her official capacity and M. ESPINOZA, Correctional Officer, in his/her official capacity
Espinoza v. Downey Savings and Loan Association, et al
as 2:2011cv00188
Plaintiff:
Robert M Espinoza and Wilma Marie Espinoza
Defendant:
Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. , U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, FCI Lender Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Espinoza v. Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. et al
as 2:2011at00075
Plaintiff:
Robert M Espinoza and Wilma Marie Espinoza
Defendant:
Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. , U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, FCI Lender Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Parker v. Adu-Tutu et al
as 2:2010cv02747
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Parker
Defendant:
Unknown Adu-Tutu, Dinnis Kendal, Unknown Phen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen v. Antique et al
as 3:2009cv02678
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
Antique, Lee, Franseal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Woodfork v. Aref Fakhoury et al
as 2:2009cv06849
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Woodfork
Defendant:
Aref Fakhoury, Mathew Cate, K Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Anthony Woodfork v. Aref Fakhoury et al
as 5:2009cv01618
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Anthony Woodfork
Defendant:
Aref Fakhoury, Mathew Cate, K Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
