Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 514
Aliferis et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2022at00073
Plaintiff: Alexander Aliferis, Kristy Carlson, Rebecca DeValle and others
Defendant: Gavin Newsom, Department of Public Health of the State of California, Director Tomas Aragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aliferis et al v. Newsom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00126
Plaintiff: Alexander Aliferis, Kristy Carlson, Rebecca DeValle and others
Defendant: Gavin Newsom, Department of Public Health of the State of California, Tomas Aragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00187
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen et al v. Clover Park School District No 400 et al
as 3:2022cv05007
Plaintiff: Xiao Yu Chen, Celebrity Access Transport and Steve Valentinetti
Defendant: Clover Park School District No 400, Heidi Mahoney, Ron Banner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mahoney et al v. Seaside Resort Development, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv09710
Plaintiff: Terrence Mahoney and King Mahoney Consulting Inc.
Defendant: Seaside Resort Development, LLC, Seaside Resort Estates I, LLC and SRD R, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08646
Plaintiff: Catherine Coffman
Defendant: Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Martha J. Demski, William W. Ericson and others
Tran v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08417
Plaintiff: Tran Tran
Defendant: Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Neil F. Mcfarlane, David L. Mahoney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08461
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
East Meets West Excursions et al v. Amplify Energy Corporation et al
as 8:2021cv01725
Plaintiff: Mike Owens and Michael Jensen
Petitioner: Patrick Mahoney, Jolynn Mahoney, Steven Rosansky and others
Defendant: BETA OPERATION COMPANY LLC d/b/a BETA OFFSHORE, a Texas Corporation, AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, a Texas Corporation, SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY, a Texas Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peter Moses Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01628
Plaintiff: Peter Moses Gutierrez, Jr., Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, Rajaskaran Wickramasekaran and others
Defendant: Amplify Energy Corporation, Beta Operating Company, LLC, Doe Corps and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Beyond Business Incorporated d/b/a Big Fish Bait & Tackle, Charlie's Gyros, Inc., Jennifer Taylor and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Amplify Energy Corp. and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Cross Defendant: Costamare Shipping Co. S.A., Cosco Beijing, Capetanissa Maritime Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant: V. Ships Greece Ltd., V.Ships Greece Ltd., Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor doing business as Marine Exchange of Southern California and others
Special Master: Daniel Garrie, James L. Smith and Bradley O'Brien
Petitioner: Christopher Hamm, Randal Klein and Todd Snyder
Intervenor Plaintiff: Markel International Insurance Company, Ltd., Ascot Underwriting Inc., QBE European Co Operations (Lloyds's Syndicate 1036) and others
Intervenor Defendant: Certain Insurers At Lloyd's of London And London Markets Subscribing To Policy No. B0180ME2001399, Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A., DOES 1-5 and others
Cross Claimant: Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?