Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Purcell v. Rowley et al
as 3:2016cv00727
Defendant:
ESP Doctor, Jones and C/O M. Rowley
Plaintiff:
Clyde Purcell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.S. et al v. County of Ventura et al
as 2:2016cv03084
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, California Forensic Medical Group, County of Ventura and others
Plaintiff:
O. M. and M. S.
Maldonado v. Evans et al
as 3:2016cv01316
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Alcaraz Maldonado
Defendant:
E. E. Evans, M. Davis, O. M. Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Snake River Corr Inst et al
as 2:2015cv02193
Defendant:
C/O Daniels, Sgt. G. Hautz, C/O A. Johnson and others
Henley:
Sgt. Franks
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Evans et al
as 2:2015cv01887
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Alcaraz Maldonado
Defendant:
E. E. Evans, M. Davis, O. M. Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulbronson v. Martell et al
as 3:2015cv01910
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Gulbronson and Conrad E. Gulbronson
Defendant:
c/o M. Narvaez, c/o Garza, Anderson, LCSW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Maldonado v. California Department of Corrections, et al
as 2:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Maldonado
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, San Quentin Prison, Solano State Prisoin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trizah Morris et al v. City of Fontana et al
as 5:2015cv00945
Defendant:
City of Fontana, Doe Defendants, Fontana Police Officer Au and others
Plaintiff:
K. M., L. M., O. M. and others
N.A.M. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv04090
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff:
N. A. M. and N. O. M.
Ratcliff v. Rowley et al
as 3:2014cv00087
Defendant:
Warden Rene Baker
Econd Level Assignee Coordinator:
S.L. Foster
Plaintiff:
Evan Ratcliff
Cert:
C/O M. Rowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
