Cases 21 - 30 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Weizhisheng Technology Co., Ltd. v. Simon S. Group, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07360
Plaintiff:
Weizhisheng Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Simon S. Group, LLC, Zan Peng, Min Sun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Peng v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
Philip C.H. Peng
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Scott v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court and Rosa Peng Mroz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Approx. $110,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2022mc00153
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $110,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Peng Jin Cai
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
