Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,515
Eli Ramos v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 5:2024cv01008
Plaintiff: Eli Ramos
Defendant: Crown Equipment Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
(HC) Ramos v. Tyler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00946
Petitioner: Salvador Ramos
Respondent: Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murillo-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3109
Petitioner: MIGUEL MURILLO-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01345
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01344
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Howe #303244 v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv01070
Plaintiff: Charles Howe
Defendant: Lupe Reyes, Christine Johnston, Catherine Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 2:2024cv03881
Plaintiff: Eli Ramos
Defendant: Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Woolen v. Ramos et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff: Andrew Thomas Woolen
Defendant: Ethan Ramos and John Doe Sergeant
Interested Party: State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2953
Petitioner: SARA ESTER ARGUETA RAMOS, PAOLA SARAI RAMIREZ ARGUETA and BRENDA LIZETH HILARIO ARGUETA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?