Cases 21 - 30 of 101
ILCSC, et al v. Richard Figueroa, Jr.
as 20-55193
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK BECKWITH, SHARON STEEN, DBA Central Pharmacy, TRAN PHARMACY, INC. and others
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARD FIGUEROA, Jr., Acting Director of Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01850
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Steen et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv06582
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Steen and Joan Steen
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adamsky et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01214
Plaintiff:
Lyndi Reichenbach, Allison Winske, Christina Gardner and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., A2Z Development Center Inc and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Bradley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv03523
Plaintiff:
John E Roberts, Melanie L. Clawson-Roberts, Robert E Bradshaw and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Ento v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv00235
Defendant:
G. Delgado, State of California, Steens and others
Plaintiff:
Christian David Ento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Steen v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-70149
Petitioner:
KEVIN NEAL STEEN
Respondent:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
(PC) Ento v. State of California et al
as 2:2018cv03191
Defendant:
Halodol, State of California, Delgado and others
Plaintiff:
Christian David Ento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Neal Steen v. Stu Sherman
as 2:2018cv09660
Petitioner:
Kevin Neal Steen
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv08212
Plaintiff:
Douglas George Steen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
