Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 184
Columbia Riverkeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2021cv01777
Plaintiff: Columbia Riverkeeper
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Pasqua Yaqui Tribe, et al v. Arizona Rock Products Associat, et al
as 21-16791
Plaintiff / Appellee: PASQUA YAQUI TRIBE, QUINAULT INDIAN NATION, FOND DU LAC BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA and others
Defendant: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL REGAN, EPA Administrator and TAYLOR N. FERRELL, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: ARIZONA ROCK PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL STONE, SAND, AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA CATTLE FEEDERS ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL SACKETT
Livable Lake Stevens v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01423
Plaintiff: Livable Lake Stevens
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Alexander L Bullock and Seattle District Commander
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Feliciano v. Young
as 1:2021cv00417
Plaintiff: Corinne Feliciano
Defendant: Gerald Dai Jow Young, United States of America Department of the Army, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
NEDC, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-35918
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and NATIVE FISH SOCIETY
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF SALEM and COUNTY OF MARION
Friends of the San Juans et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01299
Plaintiff: Friends of the San Juans, Friends of the Earth and Evergreen Islands
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v Wheeler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae: Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner: National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ace Black Ranches, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00214
Defendant: Act Region 10 Admin Michelle Pirzadeh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Administrator Michael Regan and others
Plaintiff: Ace Black Ranches, LLP and Ace Black Ranches, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilder et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00574
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Office of Counsel
Plaintiff: Abryel Wilder and Abryel Michole-Meena Wilder
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living, et al v. BLM, et al
as 21-35085
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, SIERRA CLUB, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHAD PADGETT, in his official capacity as State Director for the Bureau of Land Management Alaska and others
Amicus Curiae: ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and STATE OF ALASKA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?