Cases 31 - 40 of 1,367
Brewer v. Pro One Security PLLC et al
as 4:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brewer
Defendant:
Pro One Security PLLC and Jose Luna
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
(HC) Limon-Uribe v. Brewer
as 2:2023cv01125
Petitioner:
Agustin Limon-Uribe
Respondent:
Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tlatoani Teotl Tenamaxtle Trust ETO v. Shiela Polk, et al
as 23-55477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. TLATOANI-TEOTL TENAMAXTLE, TRUST ETO, Tenamxtle, Tlatoani-Teotl, beneficary
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIELA S. POLK, Yavapai County Attorney, STATE OF ARIZONA, Office of the Attorney General, DAVID RHODES, Sheriff and others
Brewer v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Brewer and Michael Green
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Owns, C. Bergmann-Hazed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Kelley v. David Brewer
as 23-15801
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY X. KELLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BREWER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel Gray v. David Brewer
as 23-15678
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL GRAY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BREWER, Warden
Brewer v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Brewer and Michael Green
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, M. Palmer and Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Androshchuk v. Brewer, et al.
as 2:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Edward Androshchuk
Defendant:
M. Brewer, J. Hurd, A. Cesares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
