Cases 31 - 40 of 347
Albers v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08135
Plaintiff:
Tanner J Albers
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reza et al v. Zuffa, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Moises Reza, Frank Garza, Tanner Pendergraft and others
Defendant:
Zuffa, LLC and NeuLion USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Mailloux v. PG&E Co.
as 2:2023cv00972
Plaintiff:
Tanner Mailloux
Defendant:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Mailloux v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
as 1:2023at00439
Plaintiff:
Tanner Mailloux
Defendant:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ness v. White
as 2:2023cv00566
Petitioner:
Tanner Matthew Ness
Respondent:
Dan White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USSEC v. Matthew Beasley, et al
as 23-15512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMID SHAHABE and KRISTIE YOUNG, Proposed Intervenors
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER
Christianson v. Aargon Agency, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Tanner Christianson
Defendant:
Aargon Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robert Perkins v. Robert Carlson et al
as 2:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Robert Perkins
Defendant:
Robert Carlson, William Bettencourt, David Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tanner Patterson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
John Tanner v. Acushnet Company et al
as 8:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
John Tanner
Defendant:
Acushnet Company and Acushnet Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
