Cases 31 - 40 of 19,782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
HD Supply Facilities Maintenance LTD v. Showers et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD.
Defendant:
Brandon Showers and Mark Arland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tomasso v. Romano et al
as 5:2024cv03162
Plaintiff:
Jacopo Tomasso
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Rick Wilmer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PC) Bonilla v. Bacciarini, et al.,
as 2:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Mark V. Bacciarini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLeod v. Zero Gravity Management, et al.
as 24-3266
Plaintiff:
KURT MCLEOD, an individual
Defendant:
ZERO GRAVITY MANAGEMENT, an unknown business entity, MARK WILLIAMS, an individual and ERIC WILLIAMS, an individual
Korytko et al v. Monsanto Co. et al
as 3:2024cv03052
Plaintiff:
Mark Korytko and Ia Dac Korytko
Defendant:
Monsanto Co and 1-50 Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matlock v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Claude Mark Matlock
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
D D and A D
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, ByteDance Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
