Cases 31 - 40 of 1,592
Alfred McZeal v. City of Tustin et al
as 8:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Alfred McZeal, Jr
Defendant:
City of Tustin, Brad Steen, Nicholas A. Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Rocha et al v. City of Hemet et al
as 5:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
David Rocha and Diana Rocha
Defendant:
City of Hemet, Hemet Police Department, Luke Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 2:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
David Martinez and Brad Padalecki
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gastelum-Medina v. Cain
as 2:2023cv01713
Petitioner:
Roger Gastelum-Medina
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swint v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
as 3:2023cv05910
Plaintiff:
Brad Swint
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kyle Christner v. Mike Shinoda et al
as 2:2023cv09459
Plaintiff:
Kyle Christner
Defendant:
Mike Shinoda, Rob Bourdon, Brad Delson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Gigena et al v. Rye et al
as 3:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena and Trevor Allen Oranday
Defendant:
Stephen B Rye, Brad Pope, Lyon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gigena et al v. Rye et al
as 2:2023cv01824
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena and Trevor Allen Oranday
Defendant:
Stephen B Rye, Brad Pope, Lyon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yourglich v. Pension Benefit Information LLC. et al
as 3:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
Brad Yourglich
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information LLC., Does 1 through 10 and Pension Benefit Information, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Rushford v. Cain
as 23-3135
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RUSHFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
