Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Theresa Bagliere et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02996
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Anderson, Phyllis Armstrong, Theresa Bagliere and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
McLaughlin v. Browning et al
as 3:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael L. McLaughlin
Defendant:
Amanda Browning, Charles Lee, Trevor Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Espino et al
as 3:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee-Damon Clark
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Rodrigo Espino, Nevada, State Of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Sherman et al
as 1:2015cv01533
Plaintiff:
Leslie James Gaines, Jr.
Defendant:
Stu Sherman, Bonilla, Charles Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2015cv03013
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Williams
Respondent:
People of the State of California, Dianne Hyatt, Roy Hashimoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Lee Washington v. Warner Brothers Entertainment
as 2:2014cv08921
Defendant:
Warner Brothers Entertainment
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Washington
Lee v. Omnicare, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01335
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee
Defendant:
Omnicare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Lee Washington v. Ralph A Wolfe et al
as 2:2014cv03999
Defendant:
Warner Brother Entertainment and Ralph A Wolfe
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Washington
Charles Gillenwater, II v. USDC-WAESP
as 14-71205
:
In re: CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER, II
Petitioner:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER, II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Gillenwater, II
as 14-30043
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER, II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
