Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Kaczmarek v. Myklebust
as 3:2017cv05597
Plaintiff:
Corrine Anne Kaczmarek
Defendant:
Staci L Myklebust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kabushiki Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku vs. Wolfe; et al.
as 1:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kabushiki Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku and Yugen Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku
Defendant:
Corrine K. R. Wolfe, Susan Hemmings, Elizabeth Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Alegre et al v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Joseph Morales, Julian Clay, Jamie Peart and others
Defendant:
Weldon Loudermilk, Javin Moore, Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kushel v. Marana Health Center Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv00043
Defendant:
Marana Health Center Incorporated and Freedom Park Health Center
Plaintiff:
Kushel, Corinne Kushel and Corrine Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sweet v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Sweet and Laney Sweet
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Philip Mitchell Brailsford, Corrine Brailsford and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Grady Shaver and Norma Shaver
Petitioner:
Monique Portillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Archard et al
as 3:2016cv02450
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raymond F. Archard, Michael P. Donahue, Patricia R. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Alegre et al v. Contreras et al
as 3:2016cv02442
Defendant:
Contreras, Sally Jewell, Lawrence Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Alegre, Cindy Alegre, Frank Alegre and others
Not Classified By Court:
US Attorneys Office Southern California District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sanchez v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Corrine Nicole Sanchez
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
