Cases 31 - 40 of 165
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Dailey et al
as 4:2020cv03625
Defendant:
Halftime Sports Bar, LLC, Jeffrey C Huynh, James Allen Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dailey v. A&W Concentrate Company et al
as 4:2020cv02732
Defendant:
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and A&W Concentrate Company
Plaintiff:
Steve Dailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dailey v. Westside Chruch Tabernacle et al
as 1:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
Isaac David Dailey
Defendant:
Michael Klann and Westside Church Tabernacle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Moret v. Poornima Ranganathan, et al
as 19-36109
Defendant / Appellee:
POORNIMA RANGANATHAN and ANDREA DAILEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant:
OREGON STATE HOSPITAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dailey v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv04467
Plaintiff:
Christine Dailey
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv07635
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
John J. Dailey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Daniel v. Tassone et al
as 2:2018cv03018
Defendant:
Dan Dailey and Paul Tassone
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeVan Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Hadsell v. Barry Baskin, et al
as 18-16668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY BASKIN, in his individual capacity, KIMBERLY CAMPBELL, in her individual capacity, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, in her individual and official capacity as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of California and others
Jose Ivan Salcedo v. James Dailey et al
as 2:2018cv06613
Defendant:
Known and Unkown, Caternolo and James Dailey
Plaintiff:
Jose Ivan Salcedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
