Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Johnson v. Honnold We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01118
Defendant: S. Honnold
Plaintiff: Vance Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kratz Aerial Ag Service, Inc. v. Slykerman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01070
Plaintiff: Kratz Aerial Ag Service, Inc.
Defendant: John A Slykerman , Agra Fly, Inc., Edward Johnson and others
Counter_claimant: John A Slykerman
Counter_defendant: Kratz Aerial Ag Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KRATZ AERIAL AG SERVICE, INC. v. Slykerman et al
as 1:2015at00587
Plaintiff: KRATZ AERIAL AG SERVICE, INC.
Defendant: John A Slykerman, AGRA FLY, INC., Edward Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Johnson v. Morgan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff: Vance Edward Johnson
Defendant: J. Morgan and J. Vierra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sjothun v. Banner Gateway Medical Center et al
as 2:2015cv00680
Plaintiff: Alyssa Diane Sjothun
Defendant: Banner Gateway Medical Center, AZ/DCYF/CPS , Jeni Bilski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vance Edward Johnson v. Barajas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01690
Plaintiff: Vance Edward Johnson
Defendant: Barajas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sweeney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01526
Plaintiff: Vance Edward Johnson
Defendant: Sweeney and J. Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case name not on file
as 2:2014ms00056
In Re: Matthew Edward Johnson
Sjothun v. Parker et al
as 2:2014cv01614
Plaintiff: Alyssa Diane Sjothun
Defendant: Jackie Parker, Connie Contes, Edward Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case name not on file
as 2:2014ms00046
In Re: Matthew Edward Johnson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?