Cases 31 - 40 of 56
In re: REV 973 LLC v. USDC-CALA
as 16-72624
:
In re: REV 973 LLC, a California limited liability company
Petitioner:
REV 973 LLC, a California limited liability company
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN MOUREN-LAURENS, an individual, MIREILLE MOUREN-LAURENS, an individual, MOUREN-LAURENS OIL COMPANY, a corporation and others
Hydentra HLP Int. Limited et al v. Sagan Limited et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2016cv01494
Defendant:
Sagan Limited, Netmedia Services Incorporated a Canadian Company, individually and: doing business as Porn.com, David Koonar and others
Plaintiff:
Hydentra HLP Int. Limited, Hydentra LP HLP General Partner Incorporated a foreign corporation doing business as Metart doing business as Sexart and Hydentra HLP Int. Limited a foreign corporation doing business as Metart doing business as Sexart
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nguyen v. Natera, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2016cv02226
Plaintiff:
Van Nguyen
Defendant:
Natera, Inc. , Matthew Rabinowitz , Herm Rosenman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellis v. Natera, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2016cv01554
Plaintiff:
M. Jim Ellis
Defendant:
Natera, Inc. , Matthew Rabinowitz , Jonathan Sheena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cahoj v. Natera, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2016cv01512
Plaintiff:
Mika Cahoj
Defendant:
Natera, Inc. , Matthew Rabinowitz , Jonathan Sheena and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. Natera, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2016cv01460
Plaintiff:
City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Natera, Inc. , Matthew Rabinowitz , Herm Rosenman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Sheridan Equities Holdings LLC v. Swartz & Brough Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
Sheridan Equities Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Swartz & Brough Incorporated , Masfund AZ LP , Masfund AZ General Partner LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roger Huang v. City of Los Angele
as 14-55597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER HUANG, General Partner on behalf of HYW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation
Roger Huang v. City of Los Angele
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-55400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER HUANG, General Partner on behalf of HYW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation
Alexander Marn, et al v. McCully Associates, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-15169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER Y. MARN, as an individual, ERIC Y. MARN, individually, THE ALEXANDER MARN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT, Alexander Y. Marin and Ernestine L. Marin as Co-Trustees of the Revocable Living Trust Agreement of Alexander Marn, dated June 18, 1991 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCULLY ASSOCIATES, a Hawaii registered Limited Partnership, ALA WAI INVESTMENTS, INC., a Hawaii corporation, a general partner of McCully Associates, THOMAS E. HAYES, individually and in his capacity as Court Appointed Receiver for McCully Associates and Ala Wai Investment, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.