Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Perry v. Tootell, et al.
as 3:2013cv03333
Plaintiff:
Elia Perry
Defendant:
E. Tootell, D. Leighton, D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J and J Sports Productions Inc v. Jesus J Espinoza
as 2:2013cv03214
Defendant:
Jesus J Espinoza
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions Inc
Curtis Henderson, Sr. v. California Department of Corr, et al
as 13-15725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, J. ESPINOZA and others
Cal Max Properties LP v. Dennis Espinoza et al
as 5:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
Cal Max Properties LP
Defendant:
Does and Dennis J Espinoza
Henderson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 5:2011cv04918
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, San Quentin State Prison, J Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews v. John Nepomuceno et al
as 2:2010cv01808
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews
Defendant:
John Nepomuceno, Lettie Burgett and Swindel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alve v. Edwards et al
as 3:2010cv01389
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Alve
Defendant:
D Edwards, R Silvas, J Sigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews v. John Nepomuceno et al
as 2:2010cv03425
Defendant:
Dr. Lettie Burgett, Dr. Lettie Burgett, Dr. John Nepomuceno and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews
Espinoza v. Sac County Sheriffs Dept.
as 2:2009cv02662
Plaintiff:
Eduardo J. Espinoza
Defendant:
Sac County Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braulio Espinoza v. J'al Mattoon
as 09-35705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAULIO J. ESPINOZA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
J'AL ERIN MATTOON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
