Cases 31 - 40 of 65
3Taps, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation
as 3:2018cv00855
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff:
3Taps, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bradley James Much v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv09292
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, AT and T, Actors, Actresses and Media Personalities and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Much
Fotohaus, LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 3:2017cv07339
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff:
Fotohaus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 17-16783
Amicus Curiae:
SCRAPING HUB, LTD., ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, DUCKDUCKGO, AND INTERNET ARCHIVE, ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HIQ LABS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
LINKEDIN CORPORATION
hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 17-16783
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HIQ LABS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
LINKEDIN CORPORATION
hiQ Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation
as 3:2017cv03301
Counter Defendant:
hiQ Labs, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Linkedin Corporation
Petitioner:
3Taps, Inc
Interested Party:
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Medved v. Google Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00383
Defendant:
Google Incorporated, YouTube LLC, GoDaddy Operating Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Medved and Justin Sloan Medved
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medved v. Google Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03894
Plaintiff:
Justin Sloan Medved
Defendant:
Google Incorporated, Yahoo Incorporated, GoDaddy Operating Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linkedin Corporation v. Does 1 through 100 inclusive
as 5:2016cv04463
Plaintiff:
Linkedin Corporation
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 , Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EveryMD.com LLC v. Linkedin Corporation
as 2:2016cv01424
Plaintiff:
EveryMD.com LLC
Defendant:
Linkedin Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
