Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Moreno v. General Motors Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Max R Moreno
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, KACHINA CADILLAC HUMMER SCANDIA, LLC and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norwood v. Cate et al
as 1:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Norwood
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, Kenneth Clark, K. Allison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prophet v. Clark, et al.
as 1:2008cv01748
Plaintiff:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Pratti, R. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Francis Fahy v. The Supreme Court of Californi, et al
as 08-17496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS T. FAHY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California, CARLOS R. MORENO, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California and others
Roberto R. Moreno v. T. Ochoa
as 2:2008cv04486
Petitioner:
Roberto R. Moreno
Respondent:
T. Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fahy v. George et al
as 4:2008cv02496
Plaintiff:
Francis Thomas Fahy
Defendant:
Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno, Joyce L. Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Levi, et al v. George, et al
as 08-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIMON LEVI
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, JUDY JOHNSON, DEBRA LAWSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, Chief Justice, CARLOS R. MORENO, JOYCE L. LENNARD and others
Moreno v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01500
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Moreno
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 06-15021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO R. MORENO
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, MAX FERNANDEZ, JOSHUA PINO and others
Defendant:
VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION NEUTRAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
