Cases 31 - 40 of 5,479
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramirez-Isales v. Walgreen Co et al
as 3:2024cv05304
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ramirez-Isales
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Berg, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2433
Respondent:
KRIZIA BERG, GRACE BRYANT, NOELANI DEL ROSARIO-SABET and others
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff
Starlette Thompson et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Starlette Thompson and Patrina Holloway
Defendant:
County of Riverside, San Bernardino Dept of Public Social Sevices, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ramirez v. C. R. England, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Victor Ramirez
Defendant:
C. R. England, Inc. and Does through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ramirez Aponza v. Garland
as 24-2421
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO ENRIQUE RAMIREZ APONZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
