Cases 31 - 40 of 2,555
(PC) Plunkett v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv01936
Defendant:
Bhupinder Lehil, Callen, W. Vaughn and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Hawkins v. Lowes Home Center, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hawkins
Defendant:
Junior Ramos, Does 1 to 50, Inclusive and Lowes Home Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Juan Roman Ramos v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04738
Petitioner:
Juan Roman Ramos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Quiroz v. United States of America
as 24-4525
Plaintiff:
Cristobal Varela and CRISTOBAL RAMOS QUIROZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01553
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ramos v. Garland
as 4:2024cv00282
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Petitioner:
Demetrius Verardi Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
N. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv04273
Plaintiff:
L. N.
Defendant:
Smtih, United States Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Garcia-Pineda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4393
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
GERADIN RAMOS-GARCIA and ESTHER NOHEMI GARCIA-PINEDA
Curtis Robinson v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04710
Defendant:
EVAN A MARTINEZ, Does 1 through 10, Mark E. Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
