Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Chris Mendoza, Unknown Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00188
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Mendoza, Unknown Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-15045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN MENDOZA, Deputy Warden at ADOC, UNKNOWN ADU-TUTU, Director of Medical Services at ADOC and others
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00706
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Mendoza, Unknown Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaun Darnell Garland v. D. S. Lewis
as 2:2010cv09010
Plaintiff:
Shaun Darnell Garland
Defendant:
D. S. Lewis
Anderson v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
Brian Lyle Anderson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Jim Taylor, Gene Greely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Cline v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 10-17058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT CLINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DORA SCHRIRO, ROBERT JONES, Dr., DENIS KENNDALL, Ph.D. and others
Klein v. Sight & Sound, Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Sight & Sound, Inc. dba Sight & Sound by Design, Shari S. Lewis, William J. Lewis, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Camarena v. Diep et al
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jesse Camarena
Defendant:
Joan Diep, Marshall S. Lewis, Pleasant Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig S. Lewis v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv02078
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Lewis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
