Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Williams Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Defendant:
Williams Express, Inc. and Holiday Alaska, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hybrid Promotions, LLC v. Liberty Apparel Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03144
Plaintiff:
Hybrid Promotions, LLC
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation, Liberty Apparel Company, Inc., Sears Holdings Management Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Samsung America, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv02967
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Samsung America, Inc., Byer California, Alyn Paige Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Martinez et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 4:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
Dagoberto Martinez and Victoria Laredo
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Amana Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.