Cases 31 - 40 of 2,696
Vasquez Campos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1513
Petitioner:
IRIS MARISOL VASQUEZ CAMPOS and DOUGLAS ENMANUEL IRIAS VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Vasquez v. Market Square Bakery Honey Bun Owners
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Vasquez
Defendant:
Market Square Bakery Honey Bun Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1424
Petitioner:
RODRIGO VASQUEZ RINCON and LUCIANA GABRIELA VASQUEZ GALVIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vasquez Merida v. Garland
as 24-1347
Petitioner:
DORENA LILY VASQUEZ MERIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez-Calix v. Garland
as 24-1364
Petitioner:
JUNIOR NOEL VASQUEZ-CALIX
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez v. Ortega et al
as 5:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Isaias Vasquez
Defendant:
Jose Ortega, J. Thich, D. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vasquez v. Market Square et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Vasquez
Defendant:
Market Square and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH BICK, Director of Correctional Health Care Services, individual and official capacity, JENNIFER BARRETTO, Director of Correctional Health Care Policy and Administration, individual and official capacity and others
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
