Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Spear v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00800
Plaintiff: Jeremy E Spear
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bechtel v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00782
Plaintiff: Jeffrey D Bechtel
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flaherty v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00802
Plaintiff: Francis J Flaherty
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPhaul v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00788
Plaintiff: Olas McPhaul, Jr.
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McReaken v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00783
Plaintiff: John Daniel McReaken
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00796
Plaintiff: James Roberts
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00781
Plaintiff: Peter James Little
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00786
Plaintiff: Bryan Joseph Cox
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00602
Plaintiff: Peter James Little, Jeffrey D Bechtel, Anthony Lee Terranova and others
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florer v. Uttecht et al
as 2:2008cv00190
Plaintiff: Dennis Florer
Defendant: Jeff Uttecht, Rod Shoemate, Dunleavey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?