Cases 41 - 50 of 193
(PS) Debbs v. Dignity Health Hospital
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Eural Debbs, Sr.
Defendant:
Dignity Health Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heidi Voellger, et al v. Dignity Health, et al
as 22-15051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEIDI VOELLGER
Plaintiff:
JOSE ALDANA
Defendant / Appellee:
DIGNITY HEALTH
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KUNTZ and ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER
Dignity Health v. York Risk Services Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01963
Plaintiff:
Dignity Health a California non-profit public benefit corporation doing business as Yavapai Regional Medical Center
Defendant:
York Risk Services Group Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Natarajan v. Dignity Health
as 2:2021cv02106
Plaintiff:
Sundar Natarajan
Defendant:
Dignity Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Natarajan
as 2:2021at01092
Plaintiff:
Sundar Natarajan
Defendant:
Dignity Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Natarajan v. Dignity Health
as 3:2021cv08821
Plaintiff:
Sundar Natarajan
Defendant:
Dignity Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mick Levin PLC et al v. Medicopy Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01604
Plaintiff:
Mick Levin PLC, Bache & Lynch PLLC, Marcos Morales and others
Defendant:
Medicopy Services Incorporated a Foreign For-Profit (Business) Corporation doing business as Medicopy, American Medical Response of Maricopa LLC, Mayo Clinic Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Woodward v. Dignity Health Rehabilitation Hospital
as 2:2021cv01598
Plaintiff:
Lenora Woodward
Defendant:
Dignity Health Rehabilitation Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
