Cases 41 - 50 of 213
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02147
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Paige E Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darrell E. Johnson v. Joseph Cruz et al
as 2:2019cv01189
Defendant:
Joseph Cruz, M.D. and Doctor John Blaney
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Lyell et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
Prime Enterprises, LLC and Paul E Johnson
Defendant:
Equitable Acceptance Corporation, Brad K Hansen and Chris Lyell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Bennett, et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 19-15101
Undetermined:
THE ESTATE OF JOSHUA E. WOODY, DECEASED, JESSICA F. LESTER, JOHN E. ADAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL BENNETT, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Marla Ann Bennett and LINDA BENNETT, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Maria Ann Bennett
Defendant:
THE IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00114
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
George E Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Moore et al
as 2:2018cv02427
Defendant:
Moye, Ms Moore and Brian Williams
Plaintiff:
Jerry E Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gholar v. Brownlee et al
as 2:2018cv02987
Defendant:
John R. Brownlee, City of Bakersfield and Mary E. Johnson
Plaintiff:
John Ray Gholar and John Ray Gholar, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal Trulove v. Maureen D'Amico, et al
as 18-16540
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMAL RASHID TRULOVE
Defendant - Appellant:
MAUREEN D'AMICO, ROBERT T. MCMILLAN, MICHAEL E. JOHNSON and others
Tyrone Johnson v. Raymond Madden
as 18-72046
Petitioner:
TYRONE E. JOHNSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
(PC) Johnson v. Kelley
as 2:2018cv01969
Defendant:
Lee Kelley
Plaintiff:
Gilroy E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
