Cases 41 - 50 of 52
James Erbes v. Ben Curry, et al
as 10-15448
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES HOWARD ERBES
Respondent - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, Warden and JOHN MARSHALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles et al v. Maple Star Nevada et al
as 2:2008cv01146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles and Darren Prum
Defendant:
Maple Star Nevada and Jennifer Erbes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Erb v. California Director of Corrections
as 2:2007cv02601
Petitioner:
Michael Erb
Respondent:
California Director of Corrections and Attorney General CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brouwer et al v. City of Manteca, et al.
as 1:2007cv01362
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brouwer and David Martinez
Defendant:
City of Manteca, Manteca Police Department, Charles Halford and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Brouwer et al v. City of Manteca, a political subdivision of the State of California et al
as 1:2007at00476
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brouwer and David Martinez
Defendant:
City of Manteca, a political subdivision of the State of California, Manteca Police Department, Charles Halford and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Charles et al v. Ochs et al
as 2:2007cv01212
Defendant:
Maple Star Nevada, Laurence Tokarski, Jennifer Erbes and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles, Darren Prum and Morgan Charles
Petitioner:
Erin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erbes v. Curry
as 3:2007cv03833
Petitioner:
James Howard Erbes
Respondent:
B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
