Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Ott v. Wright, et al
as 2:2008cv00391
Plaintiff: Gregory Ott
Defendant: D Wright, D Wright, Leighton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Masse v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2008cv00138
Plaintiff: Toby J Masse
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, James Miller, Brian Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Gay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-36019
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH M. SUTTON
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN GAY
Ott v. Florence Correctional Center et al
as 2:2007cv01921
Plaintiff: Gregory J. Ott
Defendant: John Gay, John Gay, John Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegney vs. Clarke, et al
as 3:2007cv05550
Petitioner: Justin M Hegney
Respondent: Harold Clarke, State of Washington, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thang v. Gay
as 2:2007cv00235
Petitioner: Vy Thang
Respondent: John Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherman v. Thatcher et al
as 2:2007cv00882
Plaintiff: Andrian Sherman
Defendant: James Thatcher, John Gay, Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Echols v. Gay
as 2:2007cv00483
Petitioner: Ramone Echols
Respondent: John Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutton v. Gay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv05148
Petitioner: Kenneth M Sutton
Respondent: John Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khat v. Gay
as 2:2007cv00230
Petitioner: Chen Khat
Respondent: John Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?