Cases 41 - 50 of 6,838
Selvester v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
John Casey Selvester
Defendant:
State of California, County of Tehama, City of Red Bluff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ace Kuumealoha Kelly v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Ace Kuumealoha Kelly
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd et al v. Moreno et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
Luis Moreno, Moshe Ben Mor and Kelli Jo Moreno
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Boyd and Valerie Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gulkarov, et al. v. Plum, PBC
as 24-2766
Plaintiff:
LUDMILA GULKAROV, JANINE TORRENCE, KELLY MCKEON and others
Defendant:
PLUM, PBC, a Delaware corporation
(PS) School v. Babineau et al
as 2:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles School
Defendant:
Kelly Babineau, Jesse Wilson, Cambria Lisonbee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Selvester v. State of California et al
as 2:2024at00537
Plaintiff:
John Casey Selvester
Defendant:
State of California, County of Tehama, City of Red Bluff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC) Kelly v. Hiaing
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
M. Hiaing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuerpe v. Slootman et al
as 5:2024cv02502
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tuerpe
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
Johnson v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05248
Plaintiff:
Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
