Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Holland v. City of San Francisco et al
as 3:2010cv02603
Plaintiff:
Elicia R. Holland
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, County of San Francisco, Heather Fong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neves v. Cate
as 1:2010at00083
Respondent:
Michael Cate
Petitioner:
Jerry Neves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neves v. Cate
as 1:2010cv00239
Respondent:
Michael Cate
Petitioner:
Jerry Neves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01680
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Pust v. Placerville et al
as 2:2009cv02729
Plaintiff:
David Allen Pust
Defendant:
City of Placerville, George Neilsen, Jason Alger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pust v. Placerville et al
as 2:2009at01568
Plaintiff:
David Allen Pust
Defendant:
City of Placerville, George Neilsen, Jason Alger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pust v. Placerville et al
as 2:2009cv02730
Plaintiff:
David Allen Pust
Defendant:
City of Placerville, George Neilsen, Jason Alger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry Neve Gomez v. K. Harrington
as 2:2009cv06819
Petitioner:
Henry Neve Gomez
Respondent:
K. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pastula v. County of El Dorado et al
as 2:2009cv01574
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pastula
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, Jeff Neves, Jeff Dreher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zaiser, et al v. County of El Dorado, et al
as 2:2008cv02529
Plaintiff:
James Zaiser, Judy Zaiser and Estate of Matthew Zaiser
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, Jeff Neves, Steve Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
