Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Robert Jones, Jr. v. Charles Ryan
as 13-16928
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT GLEN JONES, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES RYAN
Robert N. Jones v. Ventura County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv04234
Defendant:
Geoff Dean, Geoff Dean, A. Herme and others
Plaintiff:
Robert N. Jones
Jones v. Foster et al
as 3:2013cv00187
Defendant:
S. Foster, S. Moyle and L. Walsh
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Nathaniel Jones v. Gruegery et al
as 2:2013cv00062
Defendant:
Burt, Gruegery, James and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Nathaniel Jones
Cabello v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv02259
Defendant:
Whitney P. Boise, Columbia County, Thomas H. Edmonds and others
Plaintiff:
Archie Cabello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56608
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Linwood Tracy, Jr., et al v. Tiffany Miles, et al
as 12-16620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINWOOD EDWARD TRACY, Jr., Patriarch, Public Minister, Executive Administrative Officer of World Prayers Answered, a Regligious Order With a Displomatic Corp. and WILLIAM GERALD FILION, Ambassador, Pro Se, Under World Prayers Answered Embassy Mission
Defendant - Appellee:
TIFFANY MILES, NATE TURNER, NICOLE M. HOFFMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56171
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Jones v. Phillip Valdez, et al
as 12-35318
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT RICHARD JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP VALDEZ, Warden and IDAHO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bayard v. Sicolnek et al
as 1:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Antwon Maurice Bayard
Defendant:
Howard Sicolnek, Brian E Sandoval, Robert C Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
