Cases 41 - 50 of 14,947
Smith v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Jodi Renee Smith
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campos et al v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Aida Esmeralda Campos, Amy O'Neill, Autumn Byars and others
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents a constitutionally created body corporate doing business as Arizona State University and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2024cv02571
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Sheriff Yesenia L. Sanchez, Marcella Hardy, Alan Horwitz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC) Abdullah v. Casaurang et al
as 2:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
A. Casaurang, Warden, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Collins v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Collins
Defendant:
D. Smith and David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McDowell v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Giovanni McDowell
Defendant:
Steve Smith, Jeffrey Storey, Joseph Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith Cordoba v. Garland
as 24-2644
Petitioner:
JIMMY ROBERTO SMITH CORDOBA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
