Cases 41 - 50 of 65
State of California, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 19-15118
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY, TEXAS, , ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, IDAHO, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, UTAH, and WEST VIRGINIA and others
State of California, et al v. The Little Sisters of the Poor, et al
as 19-15072
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
State of Washington et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00939
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of New York, et al v. FCC, et al
as 18-70692
Petitioner:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Intervenor - Pending:
NCTA-THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, USTELECOM-THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending:
DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05389
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, John Radice, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. DJO Global Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07152
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., DJO Finance LLC, DJO Global Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, Russ Milko, Doris Modglin and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Aaron Echols v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2015cv01793
Defendant:
Does
Petitioner:
Aaron Echols
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2014mc00322
Defendant:
Alan Clark Holdings, LLC, FHTM Canada, Inc., FHTM, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
