Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv07556
Defendant:
Attorney General Kamala Harris, The California Department Corrections, The U.S. Government and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Kherdeen v. Obabma et al
as 3:2016cv02304
Plaintiff:
Mazen J. Kherdeen
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obabma, U.S. Government Executive Branch, John Hickenlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. U.S. Government
as 3:2016cv04391
Plaintiff:
Dejon Marquis Hendrix
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montgomery A. Harverual v. U.S. Government
as 2:2016cv04938
Plaintiff:
Montgomery A. Harverual
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Alleyne v. U.S. Government
as 2:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kwesi Jerry Alleyne
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Weese-Heft v. U.S. Government et al
as 5:2015cv02659
Plaintiff:
Deanna Rae Porter Weese-Heft
Defendant:
U.S. Government, FBI and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teresa Roy v. The State of California et al
as 2:2015cv03738
Defendant:
All Inclusive Syndicated Criminal Third-Parties With Obligation to the Duties of The United States Federal Government Agencies, Any Individual Employed by the U.S. Government or Third-Party Individuals in named in any documentation, The County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Roy
Alice Anderson vs. United States of America, et al
as 2:2015cv02897
Plaintiff:
Alice Anderson
Defendant:
Colton Michael Magee, U.S. Government, Department of the Navy and United States of America
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2015cv01068
Respondent:
Robert A. Barton, Carlos T. Bea, California Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Seavon Pierce
Pierce v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2015cv00331
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
U.S. Government and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
