Cases 41 - 50 of 64,132
United States of America v. Cody
as 24-3847
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEISHA MICHELLE CODY
United States of America v. Minneci
as 24-3851
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY ROSS MINNECI
United States of America v. Avila
as 24-3839
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JESSY SALVADOR AVILA
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01474
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Ryan Thornell, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 et al v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Alfred E Caraffa and Donald Felder
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Eveniya Grigoreva et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Eveniya Grigoreva and T. S.
Defendant:
United States of America and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
B-2 Market et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv05198
Plaintiff:
B-2 Market and as Owner Maher Hawatmeh
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
United States of America v. $2,606,046.54 Seized from MIDFLORIDA Credit Union Business Checking Account
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$ 2,606,046.54 Seized from MIDFLORIDA Credit Union Business Checking Account Ending in 7000
Calderon-Lopez, et al. v. Commissioner of Social Security, et al.
as 24-3809
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ and STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TIGRAN GUMUSHYAN and others
United States of America v. Valencia
as 24-3820
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDUARDO VALENCIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
